Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's score of 79.5. Even though the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Moto G 5G Plus features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G 5G Plus also has 4 more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a little sharper display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display pixels density. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size. Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a F1.7 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a lot more megapixels back camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.