Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus's global score of 82.6. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S10 is older than Moto G 5G Plus, it's design is thinner and way lighter. The Galaxy S10 features a little faster processor than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a much bigger sensor and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G 5G Plus features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.