Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Moto G 5G Plus, getting a 93.6 score against 82.6. Galaxy S10 5G is an older cellphone than Moto G 5G Plus, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner and a little lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a bit more pixels per screen inch. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and videos in low light situations and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit more memory for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Moto G 5G Plus features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.