Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 score. Galaxy S10 Lite is a a little bit thinner and lighter device than the Moto G 5G Plus, even when both of them were released only 5 months apart. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite and Moto G 5G Plus count with really similar screens, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a just a little worse pixel number in each inch of display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, they both have a screen of the same size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, a same size sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.