Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 score. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is thinner and way lighter than the Moto G 5G Plus, even though it was released about 16 months before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy S10e counts with slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.