Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than Moto G 5G Plus's overall score of 82.6. Samsung Galaxy S20's body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than Moto G 5G Plus, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. The Galaxy S20 counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Moto G 5G Plus captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a camera with much more megapixels, better 30 fps video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.