Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, with a 90.8 score against 82.6. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE construction is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, even when they were only released 3 months apart. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a little smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a little faster CPU than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto G 5G Plus has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
Galaxy S20 FE has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.