Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, but it is a little bit heavier. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better display than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a quite greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus one. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way higher 108 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.