Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Surfing blue | -- |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 score. Galaxy S21 FE is a newer device, and it's also lighter and thinner than the Moto G 5G Plus. The Galaxy S21 FE features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S21 FE features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite smaller display and a bit worse pixel quantity in each screen inch. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Moto G 5G Plus captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments and a much higher resolution camera.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.