Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, with a overall score of 95.4 against 82.6. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body has the same thickness than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, but it is just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit faster processor than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a way bigger sensor and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Moto G 5G Plus.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.