Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-08 | -- |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Surfing blue | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, with a general score of 82.6 against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a noticeably lighter and way thinner phone than the Moto G 5G Plus. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior processor than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Moto G 5G Plus features longer battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a higher resolution, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.