Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-08 | -- |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Surfing blue | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus's score of 82.6. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is much thinner and extremely lighter than the Moto G 5G Plus. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better display than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a little better pixels density, a little bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way larger sensor and a way more mega pixels camera in the back. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a battery performance that's just as good as Moto G 5G Plus's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.