Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-08 | -- |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Surfing blue | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus has a global score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 overall score. Moto G 5G Plus's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, but it's notably heavier. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a bit superior processing unit than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a graphics co-processor.
Moto G 5G Plus features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a back camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.