Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, with an 82.6 score against 79.5. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's construction is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy S7's, but it's somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Galaxy S7 has a more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a little faster CPU than Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has 4 more cpu cores.
Moto G 5G Plus captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.