Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has an overall score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's body is notably newer and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's heavier. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Moto G 5G Plus has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.