Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has an overall score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's body is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both were released with only a few months difference.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better performance than Moto G 5G Plus. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a much higher resolution camera, a much better video quality and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Moto G 5G Plus features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.