Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with a global score of 82.6 against 81. Moto G 5G Plus's design is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both were only released 5 months apart. Galaxy XCover Pro features a screen that's just as good as Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's screen, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display, they both have the same number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto G 5G Plus counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's CPU is just as good as the Moto G 5G Plus one, both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a back camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Moto G 5G Plus has better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.