Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 general score. Galaxy Z Flip's design is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Moto G 5G Plus, although both were released only a couple months apart. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better processing power than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit better screen density. The Moto G 5G Plus shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a lot larger camera sensor.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.