Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's global score of 82.6. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is noticeably heavier but also thinner. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus and the Galaxy Z Fold 2 both feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G 5G Plus takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.