Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a global score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 overall score. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than the Moto G 5G Plus, we must tell that it is also just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a display that is very similar to the screen in Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, they both have a display with the same size. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a slightly better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Moto G 5G Plus has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.