Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G's overall score of 81.5. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola Moto G 5G, even though it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G 5G. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Moto G 5G counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto G 5G also has a larger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light environments and a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G 5G features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.