Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a bit better than Google Pixel 3, with a score of 81.5 against 80. Moto G 5G is a newer device than Google Pixel 3, although it's thicker and noticeably heavier. Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density.
The Moto G 5G has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Google Pixel 3 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
Motorola Moto G 5G captures better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a larger camera aperture and a much more megapixels back facing camera. Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.