Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Moto G 5G's global score of 81.5. Google Pixel 4a is a thinner and a lot lighter phone than Moto G 5G, even though they were released only a few months apart. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a little better performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Moto G 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Moto G 5G also has a much more MP back camera. The Moto G 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.