Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a bit better than HTC One M9, having a global score of 81.5 against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Moto G 5G has the newer 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. The Moto G 5G is a much newer phone than HTC One M9, but it is extremely heavier and just a little thicker.
HTC One M9 has a brighter screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. HTC One M9 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a GPU.
Moto G 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G 5G also has a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much bigger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments.
Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G has a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.