Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G has a global score of 81.5, which is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. The Moto G 5G is a notably newer phone than HTC U Ultra, although it is heavier and incredibly thicker. HTC U Ultra has just a bit better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto G 5G has just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has more CPU cores. The Moto G 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G 5G also has a way more megapixels camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
HTC U Ultra has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G 5G features a much better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.