Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is slightly better than the LG G7 ThinQ, having an 81.5 score against 81. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G 5G has 10 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Moto G 5G is a extremely newer cellphone than the LG G7 ThinQ, although it is way thicker and much heavier.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much more vibrant display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels number per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G 5G. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G 5G has a way better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola Moto G 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.