Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| LTPS | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is slightly better than Moto G 5G's 81.5 global score. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than Moto G 5G, but it is also way heavier.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit better processor than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has more RAM. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because it has a larger screen, a little higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels.
Moto G 5G features a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G features just a bit better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola Moto G 5G counts with just a little better battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.