Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A30s, getting a score of 81.5 against 79.8. The Motorola Moto G 5G construction is newer, but a lot thicker and way heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A30s. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G 5G has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version.
The Moto G 5G features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a better pixel quantity per inch of screen, a bit larger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Moto G 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A30s. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Moto G 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Moto G 5G also has a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much higher video definition. Samsung Galaxy A30s has a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola Moto G 5G features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.