Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | -- |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is slightly better than Moto G 5G, having a general score of 82 against 81.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only and the Moto G 5G were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is noticeably lighter and thinner. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a newer 11 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Moto G 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A32 LTE Only. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Moto G 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a much less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture. Galaxy A32 LTE Only features just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Moto G 5G and Galaxy A32 LTE Only feature really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.