Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Moto G 5G, getting an 83.8 score against 81.5. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than the Moto G 5G, but it's a lot thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy A50 has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Moto G 5G has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. Moto G 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same aperture, the Moto G 5G also has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.