Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than Motorola Moto G 5G, with a 90.8 score against 81.5. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G 5G, although they were released with only 7 months difference. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a bit higher display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better camera than Moto G 5G, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have a 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G 5G, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has 128 GB internal memory.
The Moto G 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.