Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is better than Motorola Moto G 5G's overall score of 81.5. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G 5G, but it's a lot thinner and a bit lighter anyway.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G 5G has a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Moto G 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.