Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G 5G's overall score of 81.5. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. The Galaxy S20 is an older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G 5G, but it's incredibly lighter and much thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a sharper display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a larger aperture, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and higher 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has improved battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.