Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G has a score of 81.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Moto G 5G has the previous 10 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Moto G 5G is a a lot newer phone than Galaxy S5 Sport, although it's thicker and extremely heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a more vivid display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per inch of screen.
Moto G 5G counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Moto G 5G captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G 5G also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a way larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations.
Moto G 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.