Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-12-07 | -- |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | -- |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active, getting a overall score of 81.5 against 80.9. These phones include Android OS, but Motorola Moto G 5G has newer 10 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, so it provides a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels count per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a GPU. The Moto G 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Moto G 5G features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.