Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G is slightly better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a score of 81.5 against 75.8. Moto G 5G is a heavier phone than the Galaxy S7 Active, but both of them are 0.39inches thick. The Galaxy S7 Active features a more vivid display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto G 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G 5G also has a higher number of cores. Moto G 5G shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G 5G also has a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
Moto G 5G has a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.