Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 81.5 score against 77.6. The Moto G 5G is a a little lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but both are equally thin. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Moto G 5G has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
Moto G 5G has a very superior processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Moto G 5G features a slightly better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Moto G 5G also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto G 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Moto G 5G has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.