Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G has a general score of 81.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G 5G has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Moto G 5G's construction is lighter and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both were released only a couple months apart.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G 5G. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Moto G 5G has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.