Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Moto G 5G's 81.5 general score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features. The Galaxy Z Flip design is lighter and much thinner than the Moto G 5G, although it was released around 10 months before.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a just a little better pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
Motorola Moto G 5G has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments and a back camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.