Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 has an overall score of 88.7, which is a lot better than Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. IPhone 12 works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto G Fast has Android 11 operating system. Although the iPhone 12 and Moto G Fast were only released with a couple of months difference, the iPhone 12 is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Apple iPhone 12 features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher count of pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px. IPhone 12 has a quite superior performance than Moto G Fast, because although it has less cpu cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU.
The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The iPhone 12's camera is very similar to Motorola Moto G Fast's camera, because although the iPhone 12 has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a much less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Moto G Fast has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 12, because it has a 42% bigger battery size.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G Fast. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G Fast, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.