Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is way better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. IPhone 12 Pro's construction is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Moto G Fast, even though they were released only a couple of months apart. The iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Moto G Fast comes with Android 11 OS.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a lot better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixels density and a lot better 1170 x 2532 resolution. The iPhone 12 Pro has a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with a better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and 3 GB more RAM memory. IPhone 12 Pro's camera is very similar to the Motorola Moto G Fast one, because although the iPhone 12 Pro has a lower (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light images and video.
The Moto G Fast features a much better battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2815mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Fast. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Fast, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.