Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 is much better than the Moto G Fast, with a 91.5 score against 72.2. The iPhone 13 is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G Fast. The iPhone 13 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto G Fast works with Android 11 operating system. The Apple iPhone 13 has a quite superior processing power than Moto G Fast, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Apple iPhone 13 has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels. IPhone 13 and Motorola Moto G Fast count with very similar cameras, because although the iPhone 13 has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
The iPhone 13 has a slightly better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto G Fast counts with better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3227mAh.
The iPhone 13 costs a lot more than the Moto G Fast, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.