Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a lot better than the Moto G Fast, with a score of 93.3 against 72.2. Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Moto G Fast, but it is also just a little bit heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Moto G Fast works with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 13 Pro features a way better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a way better display pixel density.
The iPhone 13 Pro's camera is very similar to the Moto G Fast one, because although the iPhone 13 Pro has a lot less MP camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a little bit better storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Moto G Fast has longer battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G Fast, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.