Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Pearl white | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro is much better than Moto G Fast, with a score of 95.6 against 72.2. Even though the iPhone 14 Pro is a little bit heavier than Moto G Fast, it's thinner and also much newer. IPhone 14 Pro has iOS 16.x OS, while Moto G Fast comes with Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 1179 x 2556.
The iPhone 14 Pro features just a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. IPhone 14 Pro counts with a better performance than Moto G Fast, because although it has 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone 14 Pro captures better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Moto G Fast features longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro is way more expensive than the Moto G Fast, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.