Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 is much better than Moto G Fast, with an 81.6 score against 72.2. Apple iPhone 7's body is extremely thinner and much lighter than the Moto G Fast, even though it was released 4 years before. IPhone 7 counts with a brighter screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little better count of pixels in each screen inch.
Apple iPhone 7 features a bit better processor than Moto G Fast, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM. Moto G Fast features just a bit better camera than iPhone 7, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G Fast also has a larger diafragm aperture, a way more MP back-facing camera and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The iPhone 7 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G Fast has a way better battery duration than iPhone 7, because it has a 104 percent larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Fast. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G Fast, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.