Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting an 87.1 score against 72.2. IPhone 8 Plus's design is somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Fast, although it is just a little heavier and was released 3 years before. IPhone 8 Plus features a quite better performance than Moto G Fast, because although it has less cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 8 Plus features a sharper display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a better display density. IPhone 8 Plus features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G Fast has a way better battery lifetime than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 49 percent larger battery size. The iPhone 8 Plus takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, a lower (4K) video quality, a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 8 Plus, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Fast, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.