Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Pearl white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than Moto G Fast, getting an 88.1 score against 72.2. The iPhone X construction is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto G Fast, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone X features an incredibly better display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better screen pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436.
Apple iPhone X counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The iPhone X counts with a superior processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has lesser processing cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Motorola Moto G Fast has a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The iPhone X takes a bit better videos and photos than Moto G Fast, although it has a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a tinier aperture, a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures and a worse (4K) video resolution.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G Fast, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.