Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 overall score. Although Apple iPhone XR is older and just a little bit heavier than the Moto G Fast, it's design is still just a little thinner. Apple iPhone XR counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 828 x 1792px and a just a little higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The iPhone XR features a superior performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Apple iPhone XR shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a much less MP back camera, a smaller diafragm aperture and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Fast counts with superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Fast, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.