Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is better than Moto G Fast, with an 84.2 score against 72.2. The iPhone XS is an older cellphone than the Moto G Fast, but Apple was able to make it a bit lighter and thinner anyway. Apple iPhone XS features a more powerful processor than Moto G Fast, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Apple iPhone XS has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater display pixels density and a lot better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto G Fast has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh. The iPhone XS captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a way less MP camera in the back, a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in poorly lited environments and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G Fast, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.