Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone has a general score of 77.1, which is slightly better than the Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. Asus ROG Phone is an older and a little bit heavier phone than the Moto G Fast, but Asus was able to make it just a little thinner anyway. The Asus ROG Phone has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Asus ROG Phone also has more RAM.
Asus ROG Phone counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160. Moto G Fast takes greater videos and photos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G Fast also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The Asus ROG Phone counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory. Moto G Fast and Asus ROG Phone count with similar batteries.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Asus ROG Phone, else you can save some money and get the Moto G Fast, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.